On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > I was listening to a discussion Don and Daniel had about the current > implementation of CTFE. They talked about using a byte code interpreter. > Even implementing a really crappy byte code interpreter would be a huge > improvement. > > -- > /Jacob Carlborg
Does anyone know whether it would be worth while keeping the LLVM JIT in mind when writing this new CTFE engine?