On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 at 14:10:41 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 at 06:52:22 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Even faster then official version?
What about futures, would it possible to make it's 100%
compatibility with C version?
Not really.
The reason why it is faster is because there is no indirection
in working with the data.
If I had full SQL support like there is in the C version, and
you take that route rather then the direct access.
It will be as slow as the C version, and probably slower.
Could you explain more details? What do you mean by indirection
work with data?
