On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 23:17:56 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 22:15:47 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i put it under unlicense[1], as some other works of the same
author is using it, and it is basically the same PD.
[1] http://unlicense.org/
Unfortunately, using unlicense is just as problematic as using
public domain:
https://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/147111/what-is-wrong-with-the-unlicense
alas, that is all i can do without breaking the "spirit" of the
original terms. i'm ok with it, and people still can fork the
code and relicense in under Boost/MIT.
