On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 00:42:48 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Thursday, 3 November 2016 at 15:51:22 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Any cycles that are "newly discovered" were already there.
What was happening is that the runtime did not detect the
cycle, and was arbitrarily choosing an order for initializing
these modules. Either a) the arbitrary order happened to be
right, or b) the order didn't matter. Most of the time it's b,
because most static ctors don't depend on externally
initialized items.
My question is: any cycle is invalid?
nevermind, I found this:
https://dlang.org/spec/module.html#order_of_static_ctor
