Re: Release D 2.072.0

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky 
wrote:

I've gone through a lot of compiler upgrades on a lot of D 
projects, and in my experience, this "investigate and fix for 
the new dmd" has always been trivial (aside from one instance 
where Phobos's standard function deprecation policy wasn't 
followed).

Some things should certainly have a smooth transition path 
(like above, when replacing a Phobos function with a different 
one), but really, not everything needs to be.


They've talked about an auto-checker for dub packages. I suspect 
that will go a long way to reducing regressions.