On Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 11:37:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.

Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1002.md#review

There should be no need for me to repeat the arguments against the DIP process already made by others. I will be submitting no more DIPs or engaging in the process in any way unless and until it is significantly changed.

Reply via email to