Re: BLAS implementation for D

[9il via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 17:43:14 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
I would probably call it gnublas or gplblas something to make 
it clear that
it's got that aspect to it.
It can't ever really be "the one true" blas lib for all D users 
with that
license.
Re: merging with Mir GLAS, that seems very tricky without 
changing Mir
GLAS's license to GPL.
--bb

Yep. Mir GLAS license would be always BSL. It is possible to use 
Netlib's source codes. They are always up to date and can be used 
for BSL.