On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 20:51:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/23/2017 4:44 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 October 2017 at 22:50:51 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Coverage would give:
1| x = 2;
2| if (x == 1 || x == 2)
I.e. the second line gets an execution count of 2. By
contrast,
1| x = 1;
1| if (x == 1 || x == 2)
Interesting point, but would likely fail for more complex
stuff.
1| stmt;
2| if (api1 == 1 && api2 == 2 ||
api2 == 2 && api3 == 3)
There would be a separate coverage count for line 3 which would
be the sum of counts for (api2 == 2) and (api3 == 3).
Generally, if this is inadequate, just split the expression
into more lines.
An example for inadequate is when you cannot see which expression
is not covered:
2| if (api1 == 1 && api2 == 2 || api3 == 3)
Just splitting the expression is suggested in the blog post, but
in an automatic fashion via dfmt. That is not elegant. The
information is there just not expressed in a useable way.
