On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 14:54:48 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Just because something is 'good enough' does not make it 'good
enough' for Phobos. In the words of Andrei "Good enough is not
good enough", we need to aim higher to show what we actually
can do.
About 5 years ago (I think, I actually have the link on my other
computer but it is 2,000 miles away right now), Andrei said
something along the lines of "without the review process, we get
junk like std.json".
Ironically, that same review process may be why we still have
such "junk". (actually personally, I don't hate std.json).
If std.xml is really so bad and has been for so long, surely we
ought to take an opportunity to change that, even if the change
isn't perfect.