On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 15:51:11 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 13:28:41 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
For those not in the know, unit-threaded is an advanced testing library for D that runs tests in threads by default. It has a lot of features:

http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded

New:

* Bug fixes
* Better integration testing
* unitThreadedLight mode also runs tests in threads
* More DDoc documentation (peer pressure from Adam's site)
* Sorta kinda fluent-like asserts

On the new asserts (should and should.be are interchangeable):

    1.should == 1
    1.should.not == 2

    1.should.be in [1, 2, 3]
    4.should.not.be in [1, 2, 3]

More controversially (due to a lack of available operators to overload):

    // same as .shouldApproxEqual
    1.0.should ~ 1.0001;
    1.0.should.not ~ 2.0;

    // same as .shouldBeSameSetAs
    [1, 2, 3].should ~ [3, 2, 1];
    [1, 2, 3].should.not ~ [1, 2, 2];


I also considered adding `.should ~=`. I think it even reads better, but apparently some people don't. Let me know?

The operator overloads are completely optional.


Atila

Personally, I don't like that kind of "abuse" of operators at all. I think it looks really unusual and it kind of breaks your "flow" when reading the code.

I agree with this. If the comments weren't added, nobody reading the code would have any idea what it actually does except for whoever wrote it.


  • Re: unit-threaded v0... Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: unit-thread... Dechcaudron via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: unit-th... Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: uni... Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re:... Cym13 via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • ... Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Cym13 via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... bauss via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re:... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: uni... Dechcaudron via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: unit-thread... bauss via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to