On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 00:55, Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 02:40:15 UTC, Nicholas Wilson > wrote: > > It appears that @implicit has been removed from the > > implementation [1], but not yet from the DIP. > > > > https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/cdd8100 > > Good, It's not needed.
@implicit is desperately needed (just not for copy constructors!). Do you have confidence that an @implicit proposal will happen if you all insist that it's removed here? This is a great driving motivator to support @implicit's introduction.