On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 20:23:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/25/19 3:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2019-02-25 20:24, Mike Parker wrote:
From the process document:
“the DIP Manager or the Language Maintainers may allow for
exceptions which waive requirements or responsibilities at
their discretion.”
Having it documented doesn't make it less flawed.
Jacob, are there amends you need to make to the DIP?
This whole reply chain sounds more like the problems lie with the
DIP process not this DIP, but I'll let Jacob answer that.
