On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 11:41:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I'd been holding off on announcing this until DIP1008 actually got implemented, and now it has:

https://code.dlang.org/packages/nogc

This dub package has a @nogc version of `std.conv.text` (which probably isn't as good yet) that, instead of returning a `string` returns an `automem.vector.Vector` of char. This handles managing memory allocation for the exception message itself in `NoGcException`, which does what it says on the tin. Confused? Here's some code:

Ok, so exceptions don't rely on the GC anymore. That's super cool. However, they are still classes. So does that mean they also need RTTI (i.e. TypeInfo)? BetterC builds and some of use trying to use D in a pay-as-you-go fashion intentionally eliminate RTTI from the runtime. Is there any way we can take this a bit further to no longer require RTTI? Do exceptions even necessarily need to be classes?

Thanks,
Mike
              • Re: ... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... Valeriy Fedotov via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • Re: ... ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: nogc v0.5.0 - DIP1008 work... Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to