On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 16:04:59 UTC, Arine wrote:
``How to distinguish a different type? Use a different type.
No, is there another simpler way to do that instead?``
Is this really the line of thinking going on here? It seems
Walter has these arbitrary rules he's following which led up to
the impractical and buggy solution that was DIP1027. Rules
aren't meant to be followed blindly.
Calm down. I didn't ask how to distinguish a type. I asked how to
prevent a behaviour. There's a slight difference. If you
misunderstood that then maybe I just didn't communicate that
properly.
