On 2020-05-04 21:34:27 +0000, rikki cattermole said:
On 05/05/2020 7:26 AM, notna wrote:
Maybe you want to add an additional constraint... It would be great if
this would result in a tool, scripts or at least a simple-to-follow
to-do (say Wiki?!)... so best case we could use this also for the next
updates / releases in the future?!
The reason we can't just grab a newer copy of the unicode database and
throw it into Phobos is because the format was changed.
Sure, nevertheless, I think it makes sense to have the reproducibility
of the process in mind. Maybe not with a script that lasts for 10
years. But the process, some tools for a specific version, which can be
used as inspiration for upcoming changes.
IMO it makes a lot of sense for D to keep up close with the unicode
development.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster
