Re: Interesting work on packing tuple layout

[Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 14 June 2020 at 16:26:17 UTC, Avrina wrote:

The situation also applies to the only tuple implementation in 
D. If you are proposing a new type with emphasis on reducing 
the footprint of the tuple then I don't see a problem with 
that. Changing the existing tuple implementation would be 
problematic.

Presumably any such change would be made backwards-compatible. So 
Tuple.opIndex and Tuple.expand would still return elements in the 
order specified by the user, even if that order is different from 
the internal storage order.