On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:09:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]

Okay, fair enough. Should this still not have had approval from either Walter or Atila before being merged in? Or is that not the case for changes behind -preview?

Approval is not required for -preview. It's the testing phase of a new feature or change. As I tried to mention earlier real data and experimentation is super helpful for a DIP / formal approval (in this case one important question answered was how much code in the D ecosystem would need to be changed).

There's a bit of implicit approval by no objection as something that's worthwhile to be explored/tested, but it's only a good chance that it will be activated by default, not a guarantee.
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Petar via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Mathias LANG via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Meta via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: Relea... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: Relea... Imperatorn via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Release D 2.094.0 Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Release D 2.094.0 apz28 via Digitalmars-d-announce
  • Re: Release D 2.094.0 Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to