On Friday, 19 September 2025 at 01:43:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thursday, 18 September 2025 at 16:00:48 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
So closing thoughts - is anyone willing to help me iron out the inevitable bugs and improve things beyond this proof of concept? What the community thinks of the idea in general?

I think this is fantastic! This is good evidence you are following the right path.

And it's a great test for the concept. If there's anything that you run into that might be difficult to solve or understand, please post it!

I might need help getting std.concurrency to run with photon, vibe.d kind of works with it but I’m missing something. I got scheduler implemented forwarding to the right photon’s condvars and mutexes but I have no idea about Tid management i.e. how do I register/setup a fiber for Tid?

If I get a chance, I'll try it on my vibe-d server, but probably not for production at this point. The RPS isn't high anyways, probably more like 1 request every few minutes.

Yeah, absolutely not in production! Cannot stress enough, this is all alpha quality.


  • vibe.d-lite v0.1.0 powered... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: vibe.d-lite v0.1.... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: vibe.d-lite v... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
    • Re: vibe.d-lite v0.1.... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
      • Re: vibe.d-lite v... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
        • Re: vibe.d-li... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
          • Re: vibe.... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
            • Re: ... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
              • ... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
                • ... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce

Reply via email to