http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=633
------- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 07:01 ------- I see that the spec now says "typedef or enum" where previously it just said "typedef", thus reducing this to issue 632. So should this be marked as a dupe (and the summary of that one changed to say "Typedef/enum promotions spec ambiguous"), a dependent or what? --
