http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3131
--- Comment #4 from Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billings...@gmail.com>
2009-07-03 16:59:11 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sometimes you can have
>
> class ClassType1
> {
> }
>
> class ClassType2
> {
> ClassType1 ClassType1;
> void func(ClassType1 t){} // this ClassType1 is clearly referring to the
> type
> of "ClassType1"
> }
>
> And it's not hard to make this work. I see no reason to ignore this one.
I do. It's stupid and pointless. Just name your local variable _something
else_.
> You see, it's simple. I think it should be enhanced.
Just because it's simple doesn't mean it should be done.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
