http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2973
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2009-07-21 20:15:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Couldn't you just stick an assert in there to make sure it doesn't wrap > around? > I haven't tested, but I would think that even in debug mode, this would be > faster than using the float version. 1. Please test. What powers are you looking at? For most bases and most exponents the result will go off range. 2. I prefer returning a floating point number instead of attempting to return an integer and failing dynamically, all for a doubtful speed benefit. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
