http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3008
--- Comment #16 from Chad Joan <chadj...@gmail.com> 2009-07-30 13:13:40 PDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > See above. Without analyzing the function bodies, Applying all this to > functions will also ban things I'm not willing to give up. > > As an example: should this be alowed: > > struct S { void M(int arg) { ... } ... } > S fn() { ... } > fn().M = 5; > > how about (the equivalent): > > fn().M(5); > > how about if I rename it: > > struct OutputHandle { void Output(int arg) { ... } ... } > OutputHandle GetProcessOutput() { ... } > GetProcessOutput().Output(5); ref returns. They are awesome. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------