http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235
Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2009-08-08 11:57:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is as designed. > > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/expression.html#FunctionLiteral > "If the keywords function or delegate are omitted, it defaults to being a > delegate." > > Having the type of a function/delegate literal depend on its contents like > this > makes it hard for someone reading the code to tell which it is. Since > function > pointers and delegates are not generally interchangeable, AISI it's desirable > to keep their literal notations distinct. I think type deduction should help here as much as anywhere else. If you do want a delegate, you can always use the delegate keyword. Plus, all algorithms in std.algorithm take an efficiency toll when used with literals. (Please do not mark this as resolved; I've discussed with Walter before posting it, and he suggested I do. In general, the spec of D2 is fluid enough to not be a strong reason for invalidating a bug report. Thanks.) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------