http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2942
Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2009-10-01 00:27:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > These pseudo-ops *are* documented in older Intel manuals, like the 387 DX > User's Manual. I'm reluctant to change it. The last issue should be in a > separate report. Interesting. They aren't present in any manual which is still available. I found a website with material which was copied from the 386 manual (not 387), but it said that even in 1997, the manual was no longer officially available. I suspect that a lot of those pseudo-ops were bugs in DEBUG. (DEBUG also accepts fld addr, ST(6);). However, I just checked MSVC, and it _does_ accept fadd; (But it doesn't accept the legal faddp; !!) Pretty useless, and I think they should be abandoned, but no big deal if you want to keep them. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------