http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3673
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2010-01-05 06:04:40 PST --- Thanks, Max. Yah, the overhead is kinda crippling. I'm also thinking of TextOutputRange, which is an alias for OutputRange!(const(char)[], const(wchar)[], const(dchar)[], char, wchar, dchar). That would be 24 bytes to boot. Maybe I better use a recursive mixin to generate all functions inside the interface. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
