http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3727

           Summary: lots of "deffering SomeStructName" messages when
                    compiling
           Product: D
           Version: 2.039
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl


--- Comment #0 from Witold Baryluk <bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl> 2010-01-20 
07:27:32 PST ---
This doesn't happen in 2.037:

# dmd2 .....
...
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_KeyboardEvent
    deferring SDL_Event
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
    deferring SDL_Cursor
  ...
#

It looks like some reminescences of debuging new "forward structs" code:
bug3663: struct forward reference regresssion
bug3664: struct forward declaration causes enum to conflict with itself

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to