http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590
--- Comment #7 from Justin Spahr-Summers <justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com> 2010-04-05 21:14:23 CDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Not that I disagree this bug is obsolete, but what would you call delete on? > With the failed construction, you never got a pointer to the class data. > > If class allocators were to be saved, I think the correct behavior on a failed > constructor should be to call the deallocator. Fair point. I didn't realize that it's impossible to hold onto the pointer. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
