http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmail.com> 2010-07-04 16:44:47 PDT --- Well, like I said, the addition might not be worthwhile. It would complicate some of the other functions somewhat. It's just that it would be a fairly simple addition to get some extra functionality in comparison to say, a doubly-linked list. I have no problem if you don't think that it's appropriate to add that extra functionality to SList. I just thought that I'd point it out in case such a change would be desirable and the idea hadn't occurred to you. Personally, in my code, I'd generally just as soon use a doubly-linked list in most cases if I'm going to use a list. But SList as-is definitely has its uses, and a doubly-linked list is overkill for some situations. It probably isn't worth creating a separate SList class with just the additions to support back() and insertBack() though. In any case, this was just a suggestion, and if you don't want to use it, that's fine by me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------