http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4126
David Simcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from David Simcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> 2010-08-18 18:00:10 PDT ---
I've added ForeachType to std.traits.
(http://dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1897) I think this is a better
solution. The only thing opApply and ranges have in common is the ability to
be iterated over using a foreach loop. In some corner cases, such as when a
class/struct defines both opApply and range primitives, or when the type is a
narrow string, ElementType can be different from ForeachType. If you want your
code to be agnostic of how the foreach loop is implemented and simply iterate
over the object with a foreach loop, then what you really care about is the
ForeachType, not the ElementType.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
