http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1715
--- Comment #6 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2010-09-17 01:26:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/675 > > > > > > DMD 1.063 gives the same results for the given example and an example in > > > my > > > personal code. > > > > Yes, of course. > > > > Why did you mark this as invalid???? The bug is definitely valid, and it's > > fixed in the upcoming beta. > > Please don't do this sort of thing again. > > I guess I'm confused. It's claimed that the bug was resolved, but the latest > version has the bug. Since the latest version in fact hasn't resolved the bug, > doesn't that mean that the resolution was invalid? 1.063 is not the latest version. (BTW, if the bug was still not fixed, you'd mark it as 'REOPENED' not INVALID). Bugs get marked as fixed when they are fixed in svn, not when a release happens (the inability to distinguish between the two is something I intensely dislike about Bugzilla). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
