http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4935
--- Comment #2 from Austin Hastings <ah0801...@yahoo.com> 2010-09-24 18:01:07
PDT ---
Entertainingly, this is the "real" code I was trying to work on:
union Instruction {
ushort raw;
// Basic opcode + data
mixin(bitfields!(
Opcode, "opcode", 7,
uint, "rest", 9));
Is it only people working with opcodes that want to use bitfields? :)
Also, I think I'm going to request that repeated bitfield definitions be
allowed if they are identical - I'd like to redeclare "opcode" rather than "".
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
