http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
--- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-22 12:01:40 PST --- A recent note by Walter: > Andrei's right. This is not about making it right-associative. It is about > defining in the language that: > > ((a ~ b) ~ c) > > is guaranteed to produce the same result as: > > (a ~ (b ~ c)) > > Unfortunately, the language cannot make such a guarantee in the face of > operator > overloading. But it can do it for cases where operator overloading is not in > play. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
