http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5399
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2011-01-02 05:45:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It is not a dangerous corner case, it is a deliberate design choice. It is
> meant to facilitate writing generic code so that the same code can be
> generated
> for void and non-void return values.
Wow, D is really full of idiocy, isn't it?
If you wanted to facilitate that, you'd just allow declaring void variables and
all that. I've written generic code where _that_ would have been quite useful.
But returning non-void values in void functions? Garbage language feature.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
