https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24374

--- Comment #2 from Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+dl...@employees.org> ---
I should modify that comment, I see that I can work with betterC despite the
inability to mark the C imports as @nogc etc, as long as I haven't marked the
betterC code in that fashion.

So that was an error on my behalf, and I can continue investigating the
viability of betterC additions to existing C code.

I suspect this means not being able to optimise the repeated import of a common
C header/module across multiple betterC file, in that each will have to parse
the C source each time.

--

Reply via email to