http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5613
Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2011-02-19 11:54:02 PST ---
If exp is only 64 bits, there is ZERO value in supporting 80-bit reals. None at
all. If tests are only failing because of low exp() precision, they deserve to
fail. I would say that DMD's implementation of 80-bit exp and transcendentals
is as inaccurate as you could possibly allow. Probably too inaccurate. If
anything does worse than it, it's really, really bad.
OTOH we will need 64-bit function results, for machines where real == double.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
