http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5710



--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright <bugzi...@digitalmars.com> 2011-03-06 
15:19:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So is this an WONTFIX, then?

Unless there's an epiphany somewhere, yes. How would you suggest two hidden
context pointers be handled? Is it clear that two context pointers are required
(at least for this example)?

> Unfortunately it severely hurts my
> std.parallelism design in some use cases, and a workaround for it would be a
> significant PITA to implement, make the API uglier, and possibly be
> inefficient.

I don't know enough about your design to offer help with that. Perhaps instead
of an alias parameter, make fun explicitly a delegate?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to