http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
--- Comment #16 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 08:38:50 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > I'm still fairly sure I've seen Walter say no to this request somewhere. > > If I > > can find it I'll change the report to spec/enhancement. > > This isn't an enhancement. That the compiler doesn't behave according to the > spec is an outright bug. > > It might be a case of removing the statement from the spec. But > - it won't stop people wanting the compiler to warn of an unused local > variable, so this would remain valid albeit as an enhancement request > - any clue of why Walter may have changed his mind about this? All I can find is http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Unused_variables_better_as_error_or_warning_115751.html#N115794 and http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/c++/command-line/282.html (from 2003!) If the spec is wrong, then this _is_ a valid enhancement _and_ a valid spec bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
