http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
--- Comment #10 from yebblies <yebbl...@gmail.com> 2011-06-13 22:21:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > I don't understand. Elsewhere I have a bug report that asks for a new error > message if you don't use the result of a pure function. > But this bug report just asks for a better error message in the situation of > using "return x;" in a void function. So I expected an error message like: > > foo.d(20): Error: a void function can't return 'int'. Returning an int expression from a void function is perfectly legal, so long as the expression has side effects. This is explicitly allowed by the spec. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#ReturnStatement You're talking about two completely separate issues, both of which are enhancements. This issue is about providing a clearer error message without changing the spec. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------