http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6221
--- Comment #5 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2011-07-01 03:12:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Shouldn't opCmp be relaxed like opEquals in bug 3659? It is indeed the same issue. But I'm not convinced by the proposed solution in bug 3659. We don't need more options -- we just need one GOOD one. IMHO, this is *the* remaining black hole in the language. We have a zoo of parameter passing options -- in, inout, out, ref, const ref, auto ref -- and yet it's not possible to express the most basic parameter passing option: "I want read-only access from this value, and I give the compiler freedom to pass it as efficiently as possible." -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------