http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
--- Comment #23 from Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> 2011-07-24 07:54:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) >> (In reply to comment #20) >>> class Foo {} >>> class Bar : public Foo {} >>> void main() {} >> >> There are no attributes as such in your example. And I don't see >> anything that isn't meaningful. So what do you mean? > > I think bearophile is referring to the �public� protection attribute in the > SuperClass. This is explicitly allowed by the grammar, but I don't know off > hand if it actually has any effect in the current implementation, other than > giving C++ programmers a wrong sense of coziness maybe. ;) Therein lies my point - it isn't an attribute as such, and it isn't meaningless. It means the same as in C++, though it doesn't make sense to have the feature in D. But this point is covered by issue 177. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------