http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-10 02:35:35 PDT --- See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144237 >From that post: > The solution is to add some symbol that explicitly marks the array as not > complete, so both the compiler and > the person that later reads the code > knows some items are missing. > > If no item is missing the compiler probably has to generate an error again: > > int[2] arr = [1, 2, ...]; // compile-time error > > I think that syntax is explicit and readable enough. A problem with this idea > is > this syntax is probably not > used often. On the other hand leaving that trap > in > the D language is not good at all. > > The idea of the dollar symbol can't be used with the ellipsis symbol: > > int[$] arr = [1, 2, ...]; // compile-time error again > > Note: for me this syntax with $ is more commonly useful compared to the "..." > syntax. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
