http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6662
Summary: std.functional.memoize with structs Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-13 04:18:51 PDT --- In the following D2 program only the Mfoo1 compiles: import std.functional: memoize; struct Foo1 { int x; static Foo1 opCall(int x_) { Foo1 f; f.x = x_; return f; } } struct Foo2 { int x; } struct Foo3 { int x; this(int x_) { this.x = x_; } } void main() { alias memoize!Foo1 Mfoo1; alias memoize!Foo2 Mfoo2; alias memoize!Foo3 Mfoo3; } DMD 2.055 gives errors like: ...\src\phobos\std\traits.d(128): Error: static assert "argument has no return type" ...\src\phobos\std\functional.d(713): instantiated from here: ReturnType!(Foo2) test.d(21): instantiated from here: memoize!(Foo2) ...\src\phobos\std\traits.d(128): Error: static assert "argument has no return type" ...\src\phobos\std\functional.d(713): instantiated from here: ReturnType!(Foo3) test.d(22): instantiated from here: memoize!(Foo3) The static assert is in std.traits: template ReturnType(/+@@@BUG4217@@@+/func...) if (/+@@@BUG4333@@@+/staticLength!(func) == 1) { static if (is(FunctionTypeOf!(func) R == return)) alias R ReturnType; else static assert(0, "argument has no return type"); } I think Mfoo2 and Mfoo3 too should compile. Writing Foo2(5) is like calling the function Foo2 with argument x = 5, and returning a struct Foo2 result. I think this is a place where telling apart structs and functions is an artificial distinction that is the opposite of useful. See one use case: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144333 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------