http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
--- Comment #5 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2012-03-01 03:39:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Just wondering, why was this marked as "Resolved, Invalid" with no > > > comment? > > > > Huh? Comment #1 was added when it was closed. Reclosing. > > Wait what? > > "This looks like false pointers [...] We really need precise heap scanning." > > Doesn't that mean this needs to be fixed? Or is one of us misunderstanding the > meaning of the above? No, it's inevitable that a mark-and-sweep GC on a 32 bit system won't work if large numbers of false pointers are present. And this code: foreach (i; 0 .. count) a ~= i; is flooding the system with false pointers. You marked this as regression, is there any previous compiler where this worked? (reopen if it there is). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------