http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #9 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> 2012-04-10 10:11:53 PDT --- > If bug preventing almost any x64 D code interconnecting with C libs is not a > blocker, I can hardly imagine what is. I don't know how Walter decides that sort of thing or how he treats blockers. I believe that the worse that we normally see is critical. But this is something which has _never_ worked, and it's in a newer feature - 64-bit code generation - and it's something that not everyone is using. So, something which was in D itself (as opposed to how it talks with C code) which used to work but doesn't now could certainly be more of a blocker than this, depending on what it was. But in general, 64-bit specific stuff is less critical in that it only affects those using 64-bit rather than _everyone_ like many bugs do. I would actually expect Walter to consider this critical rather than a blocker. Certainly, if blocker indicates that something should block a release, this isn't it, since the bug has been around for as long as dmd's 64-bit code generation has been. But that's up to him. Regardless, this is a huge issue, and it should probably be treated as a higher priority than it has been, but much of what _has_ been being worked on is high priority stuff which affects much more D code than this does, so I suppose that it's not all that surprising that Walter hasn't gotten around to this yet. Still, I'd hope that this would be taken care of sooner rather than later. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------