http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7909
--- Comment #2 from Adam D. Ruppe <destructiona...@gmail.com> 2012-04-14 07:57:10 PDT --- Well, a simple enough fix for the first one is to tighten up the constraint on toImpl for the isIntegral one. Line 1156 of conv.d, add: !is(S == enum). Doesn't seem to break anything (indeed, if isIntegral used to always return false on enums, it'd just be restoring the previous behavior anyway). Now, for the parsing side. We can do basically the same thing. Line 1708 of conv.d, add: && !is(Target == enum). That takes the isIntegral variety out of consideration, and then it uses the correct enum version. Strange that it didn't say "matches more than one" again, since it is basically the same thing, but meh, whatever, this fixes it and didn't break the other cases I tried. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
