http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8027
Summary: in contract is never checked for overrided functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: adam.chrapkow...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Adam Chrapkowski <adam.chrapkow...@gmail.com> 2012-05-03 14:11:30 PDT --- import std.stdio; class Foo { int foobar(int a, int b) in { assert (a > 0 && b > 0); writeln("Foo in"); } out(ret) { assert(ret > 0); writeln("Foo out"); } body { return a + b; } } class Bar : Foo { override int foobar(int a, int b) in { assert(a * b + 8 > 1); writeln("Bar in"); } out(ret) { assert (ret > 1); writeln("Bar out"); } body { return 2; } } void main() { try { auto _foo = new Bar(); _foo.foobar(1, 2); } catch (Exception e) { writeln(e); } } ______________________________________________________________________ IN contract for function Bar.foobar() is never checked. For me it makes sense (becuse in contracts must be checked by the caller which may not know anything about overriding function) but compiler should not allow to define IN contract for an overriding function. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------