http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #32 from Stewart Gordon <s...@iname.com> 2012-05-04 10:38:33 PDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > fizzbuzz() clearly has a bug. It will fail if given an A which isn't actually > a > B. Exactly. fizzbuzz is calling a method of A, not a method of B. As such, as I've already said, it must conform to A's API, but it is failing to do so. (In reply to comment #31) > I understand the distinction, and how the slides doesn't make it clear that > the > precondition is dynamically bound. In fact the author found it so obvious as > to > be unnecessary to mention So it could have been just an oversight for all we know. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
