http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7780
--- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com> 2012-05-19 03:01:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Also trivial methods hides mixin overloads: > [snip] Actually, that is quite clearly described under template mixins[1]: "If the name of a declaration in a mixin is the same as a declaration in the surrounding scope, the surrounding declaration overrides the mixin one" I agree it would be nice to have a way to not have them override, but I can absolutely see why one might want that rule. [1]: http://dlang.org/template-mixin.html -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
