http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4436
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> 2012-05-30 18:55:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Consider: > > import std.stdio, std.typecons; > > struct S > { > this(this) { writeln("making a copy"); } > } > > void main() { > Tuple!(S, int) x; > auto p1 = &(x.init); > //auto p2 = &(Tuple!(S, int).init); > } > > The program as is calls the copy constructor of S twice. It should call none > (for at least two reasons: effciency and the fact that some types want to > disable copying). > > Furthermore, uncommenting the last line in main yields a compile-time error. > It > should compile and run (again without invoking the copy constructor). >From 2.059, T.init always returns rvalue even if T is struct. So getting address of init property by & operator is rejected in compile. I think this issue should be closed with the status "resolved invalid". -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------