http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6579
--- Comment #5 from art.08...@gmail.com 2012-06-03 06:42:55 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It hinders overloading. For so long I wanted to be able to have both static > and > non-static opDispatch and opCall and couldn't because of this. This is a very good argument. opCall&co are a bit special, but doing that should be possible w/o special-casing them. > This behavior is not doing any good anyway. It has worked like that for a long time, and it is useful sometimes. But the old behavior can be easily emulated with something like static int f() {}; auto f(A...)(A a) { return typeof(this).f(a); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------